INTERNATIONAL
OIE Reference laboratory mandates
|
FAO Reference Centres
18 identified technical areas in animal health for which Reference Centres are required: Thematic areas:
Specific disease focus:
One of FAO’s global missions is to provide field and technical support to its member countries to prevent or control major diseases of poultry, livestock and wildlife. FAO can better fulfil its obligations in promoting livelihoods and safeguarding animal health in partnership with institutions – academic, research, laboratories and others – that have expertise in areas such as veterinary diagnostics, vaccines, research, biocontainment, epidemiology and wildlife health. The Reference Centres designated by FAO are regarded as centres of excellence in providing scientific and technical expertise, diagnostic services, laboratory and field training, in coordinating research and developmental studies, and in contributing to FAO projects. Reference Centres are expected to provide assistance and expertise in:
Usefult links: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations http://www.fao.org/home/en/ |
FAO Reference Centres for animal health are institutions designated by the Director-General to provide specific, independent technical/scientific advice on issues related to FAO’s mandate. FAO plans to designate about 50 Reference Centres in the field of animal health and has identified 18 technical areas for which collaboration with Reference Centres is currently required. Other areas will be identified as needs arise.
Presentation
The Brucellosis EURL missions
- Coordinate the methods employed in the MS for diagnosing brucellosis;
- Typing, storing and supplying strains of Brucella sp.
- Preparing, controlling and supplying EU Standard sera and other reference reagents to the NRLs (to standardise tests and reagents in the MS)
- Validating reference reagents (antigens and National Standard sera)
- Building up and maintain a sera bank, a collection of Brucella sp., and a database of strains isolated across the EU
- Organising periodical comparative tests of diagnostic procedures at EU level and operating laboratory proficiency tests of NRLs
- Collecting and collating data and information on the methods of diagnosis used and the results of tests carried out in the EU
- Characterizing Brucella sp by the most up-to-date methods available to allow greater understanding of the epidemiology of brucellosis
- Keeping abreast of development in brucellosis surveillance, epidemiology and prevention throughout the world
- Acquiring a thorough knowledge of the preparation and use of the products of vet. immunology used to eradicate and to control brucellosis including the evaluation of vaccines
- Facilitate harmonization of techniques throughout the EU, in particular specifying standard test methodologies
- Organise workshops for the benefit of NRLs, including training of experts from the MS and, as appropriate, from non-member countries, in new analytical methodologies.
- Provide technical assistance to the Commission, concerning in particular the standardisation of analytical methods and their implementation
- Perform research activities and whenever possible co-ordinate research activities directed towards improving control and eradication of brucellosis, specifically by:
- Carrying out or collaborating with NRLs in carrying out test validation trials
- Providing scientific advice to the Commission services and collecting information and reports associated with the activities of the EURL
- Assist actively in the diagnosis of brucellosis outbreaks in MS by receiving pathogen isolates for confirmatory diagnosis, characterisation and epidemiological studies;
- Facilitate the initial or further training of experts in laboratory diagnosis with a view to the harmonisation of diagnostic techniques throughout the EU;
- Collaborating, as regards diagnostic methods, with the competent laboratories in third countries where the disease is prevalent;
- Conduct initial and further training courses for the benefit of staff from NRLs and of experts from developing countries.
Epidemiology of Brucellosis
Epidemiological surveillance, Phylogeography
Epidemiological surveillance is the ongoing and systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of health-related data. Guidelines have been proposed by FAO (2003). The process involves describing and monitoring health events in populations of humans or animals, or, in the case of a zoonosis such as brucellosis, both. For example, typical questions to which a surveillance system might be asked to provide answers include:
-
How extensive is the infection, and when and where is it occurring?
-
Which species of Brucella are involved?
-
Which animal species are involved?
-
Is the prevalence and incidence (human or animal) decreasing, increasing or static?
-
When epidemics occur, what is the source, and how is the agent being transmitted?
-
What strategies should be adopted to control, prevent and ultimately eradicate the infection?
-
What are the knowledge, attitudes and practices of the populations affected?
-
What laboratory or field research needs to be undertaken?
More recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and FAO have been collaborating to develop the Brucellosis One Health Guidance and Tools (BOHGAT), a set of complementary resources that use a multisectoral, One Health approach to assist counties in preventing, controlling and eliminating brucellosis in animals and people. Resources within the BOHGAT that are nearing finalization include the Stepwise Approach for the Progressive Control of Brucellosis (SAPCB) and the Staged Tool for the Elimination of Brucellosis (STEB).
Phylogeography is the study of the spatial arrangement of genealogical lineages, especially within and among conspecific populations and closely related species. One of several new types of nuclear data stemming from next-generation sequencing involves the recovery of single nucleotide polymorphismes (SNPs) from many thousands of unlinked nuclear genomic regions, even in nonmodel species. SNPs are increasingly being used to supplement more traditional phylogeographic datasets based on cytoplasmic genomic sequences or allelic profiles at relatively small numbers of microsatellite loci. The term “landscape genetics” has blossomed in recent years into a recognizable and popular research arena, purportedly forming a needed bridge between landscape ecology and population genetics (much as the field of phylogeography attempted to bridge phylogenetics and population genetics; Avise et al, 2016).